Barker Speaks
Nick Land
The CCRU interview with Professor D.C. Barker
Daniel Charles Barker has been Professor of Anorganic Semiotics at Kingsport
College (MVU, Mass.) since 1992. His extraordinary intellectual achievements
resist easy summarization, involving profound and polymathic engagement across
the entire range of life and earth sciences, in addition to archaeocultural
research, mathematical semiotics, anatomical linguistics, and informatic
engineering. Trained as a cryptographer in the early 1970s, he has spent his
life decoding ancient scripts, quasibiotic residues, and anomalous mineral
patterns (amongst other things). In late Autumn 1998 Ccru met with Professor
Barker in his office at MVU. The following is an edited transcript of that
meeting.
Tic-Systems. Cryptography has been my guiding thread, right through. What is
geotraumatics about, even now? — A rigorous practice of decoding. So I haven't
really shifted at all in this respect. There is a voyage, but a strangely
immobile one.
I started out at MIT working in the information sciences — my thesis proposal
was quite conservative, involving mostly technical issues to do with noise
reduction and signal modulation — but MVU was just getting started, and my
research was transferred across to them. That led to various contacts, and from
there to employment with a NASA-related organization that has particular
interests connected to SETI activity. My task was to help toughen-up the
theoretical basis of their signals analysis. They wanted to know how to
discriminate — in principle — between intelligent communication and complex
pattern derived from nonintelligent sources. To cut a long story short, it
became increasingly obvious to me that although they said they were hunting for
intelligence, what they were really seeking was organization. The whole program
was fundamentally misguided. Various people had big problems with the direction
of my research, which had basically veered-off the organizational model. The
social friction became intolerable and I had to leave, which was messy because
of my high-level security clearance ...
Suborganizational pattern is where things really happen. When you strip-out all
the sedimented redundancy from the side of the investigation itself — the
assumption of intentionality, subjectivity, interpretability, structure, etc—
what remains are assemblies of functionally interconnected microstimulus, or
tic-systems: coincidental information deposits, seismocryptions, suborganic
quasireplicators (bacterial circuitries, polypoid diagonalizations, interphase
R-Virus, Echo-DNA, ionizing nanopopulations), plus the macromachineries of
their suppression, or depotentiation. Prevailing signaletics and
information-science are both insufficiently abstract and over-theoretical in
this regard. They cannot see the machine for the apparatus, or the singularity
for the model. So tic-systems require an approach that is cosmic-abstract —
hypermaterialist — and also participative, methods that do not interpret
assemblies as concretizations of prior theories, and immanent models that
transmute themselves at the level of the signals they process. Tic-systems are
entirely intractable to subject/object segregation, or to rigid disciplinary
typologies. There is no order of nature, no epistemology or scientific
metaposition, and no unique level of intelligence. To advance in this area,
which is the cosmos, requires new cultures or — what amounts to the same — new
machines.
The problem was: how to quantify disorganized multiplicities? Diagonal,
irregular, molecular, and nonmetric quantities require a scale that is itself
nonmetric, that escapes overcoding. Standard procedures of measurement and
classification prove entirely inadequate, since they presuppose rigid
conceptual segmentation by quantity and quality (Deleuze-Guattari's
twin-pincers of molarity, type and degree). Once things are being worked out at
the level of tic-assemblies — or flat ticking arrays — there are only intensive
populations, and measurement has to give way to engineering fusional
multiplicities: systems that count themselves only in the way they propagate,
immanently numbering multitudes, like nanoplastic quantum swirls. Eventually a
machinic solution was provided by the Tick-Distributor, but that came later ...
At first there was just the equation, precipitated in what I still thought to
be my own body, virtual tic-density = geotraumatic tension.
Geotraumatics. I came to Freud relatively late, associating it with oedipal
reductionism, and more generally with a psychologistic stance that was simply
irrelevant to cryptographic work. It's important to remark here — no doubt
we'll get back to this — that everything productive in signals analysis stems
from stripping out superfluous prejudices about the source and meaning of
complex functional patterns. I took — and still take — the vigorous repudiation
of hermeneutics to be the key to theoretical advance in processing
sign-systems. It was Echidna Stillwell who helped me to see Freud from the
other side. It was a difficult period for me. There had been a lot of painful
fall- out from the Nasa work. Psychotherapists were involved, in part
attempting to pathologize and discredit my research, and in part responding to
real stress-related symptoms. Between the two was a grey zone of traumatic
dysfunction and paranoia involving difficult feedback effects. Stillwell
persuaded me that the only way to get through this was to try and make sense of
it, and that this was not the same as submitting to the interpretative mode. On
the contrary. In Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Freud takes a number of crucial
initial steps towards mapping the Geocosmic Unconscious as a traumatic
megasystem, with life and thought dynamically quantized in terms of anorganic
tension, elasticity, or machinic plexion. This requires the
anorganizational-materialist retuning of an entire vocabulary: trauma,
unconscious, drive, association, (screen-) memory, condensation, regression,
displacement, complex, repression, disavowal (e.g. the un- prefix), identity,
and person.
Deleuze and Guattari ask: Who does the Earth think it is? It's a matter of
consistency. Start with the scientific story, which goes like this: between
four point five and four billion years ago — during the Hadean epoch — the
earth was kept in a state of superheated molten slag, through the conversion of
planetesimal and meteoritic impacts into temperature increase (kinetic to
thermic energy). As the solar-system condensed the rate and magnitude of
collisions steadily declined, and the terrestrial surface cooled, due to the
radiation of heat into space, reinforced by the beginnings of the hydrocycle.
During the ensuing — Archaen — epoch the molten core was buried within a
crustal shell, producing an insulated reservoir of primal exogeneous trauma,
the geocosmic motor of terrestrial transmutation. And that's it. That's
plutonics, or neoplutonism. It's all there: anorganic memory, plutonic looping
of external collisions into interior content, impersonal trauma as drive-
mechanism. The descent into the body of the earth corresponds to a regression
through geocosmic time.
Trauma is a body. Ultimately — at its pole of maximum disequilibrium — it's an
iron thing. At MVU they call it Cthelll: the interior third of terrestrial
mass, semifluid metallic ocean, megamolecule, and pressure-cooker beyond
imagination. It's hotter than the surface off the sun down there, three
thousand clicks below the crust, and all that thermic energy is sheer
impersonal nonsubjective memory of the outside, running the plate-tectonic
machinery of the planet via the conductive and convective dynamics of silicate
magma flux, bathing the whole system in electomagnetic fields as it tidally
pulses to the orbit of the moon. Cthelll is the terrestrial inner nightmare,
nocturnal ocean, Xanadu: the anorganic metal-body trauma-howl of the earth,
cross- hatched by intensities, traversed by thermic waves and currents,
deranged particles, ionic strippings and gluttings, gravitational
deep-sensitivities transduced into nonlocal electromesh, and feeding vulcanism
... that's why plutonic science slides continuously into schizophrenic delirium.
Fast forward seismology and you hear the earth scream. Geotrauma is an ongoing
process, whose tension is continually expressed — partially frozen — in
biological organization. For instance, the peculiarly locked-up lifeforms we
tend to see as typical — those more-or-less obedient to darwinian selection
mechanics — are less than six hundred million years old. They began with the
planetary
oxygenization crisis, triggered by the saturation of crustal iron, followed by
mass oxygen-poisoning of the prokaryotic biosystem and the emergence of a
eukaryotic regime. Eukaryotic cells are highly suppressive. They implement a
nuclear command-control model based on genomic ROM, affined to meiosis-mitosis
diplocapture, hierarchical organization, and multicellular specialization. Even
the distinction between ontogeny and phylogeny — distinct time-orders of the
individual and the species— makes little sense without eukaryotic nuclear
read-only programming and immunological identity. Evolutionism presupposes
specific geotraumatic outcomes.
To take a more recent example, the efflorescence of mammalian life occurs in
the wake of the K/T- Missile, which combined with massive magma-plume activity
in the Indian Ocean to shut-down the Mesozoic Era, sixty-five million years
ago. Irruptive vulcanism plus extraterrestrial impact, linked by coincidence,
or plutonic looping. So there is a catastrophic transition to a post-saurian
megafauna regime, part of a much larger overall reorganization of terrestrial
symptomaticity, providing an index of neohadean resurgence. And what is
mammalian life relative to the great saurians? Above all, an innovation in
mothering! Suckling as biosurvivalism. Tell me about your mother and you're
travelling back to K/T, not into the personal unconscious.
Spinal-Catastrophism For humans there is the particular crisis of bipedal
erect posture to be processed. I was increasingly aware that all my real
problems were modalities of back-pain, or phylogenetic spinal injury, which
took me back to the calamitous consequences of the precambrian explosion,
roughly five hundred million years ago. The ensuing period is incrementally
body- mapped by metazoan organization. Obviously there are discrete
quasi-coherent neuromotor tic-flux patterns, whose incrementally rigidified
stages are swimming, crawling, and (bipedal) walking. Elaine Morgan
persuasively traces the origin of protohuman bipedalism to certain deleterious
plate- tectonic shifts. The model is bioseismic. Crustal convulsions and animal
body-plan are rigorously interconnected, and the entire Aquatic Ape Theory
constitutes an exemplary geotraumatic analysis. Erect posture and
perpendicularization of the skull is a frozen calamity, associated with a long
list of pathological consequences, amongst which should be included most of the
human psychoneuroses. Numerous trends in contemporary culture attest to an
attempted recovery of the icthyophidian- or flexomotile-spine: horizontal and
impulsive rather than vertical and stress- bearing.
The issue here — as always — is real and effective regression. It is not a
matter of representational psychology. Consider Haeckel's widely discredited
Recapitulation Thesis, the claim that ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. It is a
theory compromised by its organicism, but its wholesale rejection was an
overreaction. Ballard's response is more productive and balanced, treating DNA
as a transorganic memory-bank and the spine as a fossil record, without rigid
onto-phylogenic correspondence. The mapping of spinal-levels onto neuronic time
is supple, episodic, and diagonalizing. It concerns plexion between blocks of
machinic transition, not strict isomorphic — or stratic redundancy — between
scales of chronological order. Mammal DNA contains latent fish- code (amongst
many other things).
Palate-Tectonics. Due to erect posture the head has been twisted around,
shattering vertebro- perceptual linearity and setting-up the phylogenetic
preconditions for the face. This right-angled pneumatic-oral arrangement
produces the vocal-apparatus as a crash-site, in which thoracic impulses
collide with the roof of the mouth. The bipedal head becomes a virtual speech-
impediment, a sub-cranial pneumatic pile-up, discharged as linguo-gestural
development and cephalization take-off. Burroughs suggests that the protohuman
ape was dragged through its body to expire upon its tongue. Its a twin-axial
system, howls and clicks, reciprocally articulated as a vowel-consonant
phonetic palette, rigidly intersegmented to repress staccato-hiss continuous
variation and its attendant becomings-animal. That's why stammerings,
stutterings, vocal tics, extralingual phonetics, and electrodigital voice
synthesis are so laden with biopolitical intensity — they threaten to bypass
the anthropostructural head-smash that establishes our identity with logos,
escaping in the direction of numbers.
Barker Numbering. Once numbers are no longer overcoded, and thus released from
their metric function, they are freed for other things, and tend to become
diagrammatic. From the beginning of my tic-systems work the most consistent
problems have concerned intensive sequences. Sequence is not order. Order
already supposes a doubling, a level of redundancy: the sequenced sequence. A
decoded sequence is something else, a sheer numeracy prior to any insertion
into chronologic structure. That's why decoding number implies an escape from
assumptions of progressive time. Tick multitudes arrive in convergent waves,
without subordination to chronology, history, or linear causation. They proceed
by infolding, involution, or implex. It's a matter of convergence, and numbers
do that, once they're free to. So the first stage required plexive
introgression of the tic- density scale, which was numerically rigorized as
digital twinning. Treat the decimal numerals as a set of 9-sum twins —
zygonovize — and they map an abstract intensive wave, indifferent to magnitude.
Everything efficient about digital reduction is concerned with this, since it
discovers the key to decimal syzygetic complementarity: 9 = 0. A flattening
down to disordered sequentiality, or abstract numerical implex. Nine is the
ultimate decimal numeral, operating as positive (or full- body) zero. It is the
abstract numeric product of the decimal-magnitude minus one (infinitesimalized
as 1 = 0.999... reiterating), which relates to a particular mode of
proliferation within capitalist semiotics (of the type $99.99).
Barker-Spiral. The pattern really came together with the Diplozygotic Spiral,
which arrived suddenly, by chance. I was playing a game of Decadence, which I
had first encountered many years before. This game already interested me
because of its numerical elegance, its complex associations, and its dependence
upon a principle of decimal twinning. It had always seemed to hint at a lost
syzygetic arithmetism, related to the bilateral symmetry of the human body.
Digits are fingers, and they come in decimal packages of two times five. In
Decadence five makes ten by doubling, or pairing with itself, scoring zero.
This tantalized me, but I couldn't fit it together theoretically. The quandary
was unlocked on this occasion, when one of the participants casually mentioned
the existence of an occulted variation of the game, called Subdecadence, based
on a system of nine-sum twinning. Subdecadence introduces zeroes, and nine-zero
twins. It works by zygonovic numerism. That was stunning enough in itself, but
seeing the two together — or seeing between them — was an incredible moment of
diagrammatic assemblage. It all spontaneously condensed, and the Spiral clicked
into coherence, like a secret door into the long-hidden crypt of the decimal
system.
Publications
Quasi Chemical Tic Culture Catalysis of Anorganic Pain Wave Matrices —
(Plutonics: Volume X, Number 6, Fall 1990).
Anorganic Semiotics — (Plutonics: Volume X, Number 9, Fall 1991).
Spinal Catastrophism — (Plutonics: Volume X, Number 10, Spring 1992).
Palate Tectonics — (Plutonics: Volume 10, Number 12, Fall 1992).
Vowels: A Biopolitical Strategy — (Plutonics: Volume X, Number 18, Fall 1994).
What Counts as Human (Kingsport: Kingsport College Press, 1997).